data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f62f5/f62f5de2573f27864768dea114e5626cc1ef93c0" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9273e/9273ece285440c18aecdcd2f1ded88e676c876d0" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6ab6e/6ab6ee9b1e67dde32a5057c5b8145d0ed76dbcf8" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9c3b4/9c3b48dc686b8c0ff1fd752d5efe985fdac9f75a" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7c8e/d7c8eb2cc77348482d408828293ba1b8656e138a" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/603b2/603b242c0e5c183115df0b004bc0bab8b5230d3c" alt=""
Site design donated by
Riley communications,
Old Saybrook
"De laudace, encore de laudace,
et toujours de laudace."
|
Questions
and answers regarding river preservation |
Q:
Why all the fuss about public-access areas? Should people really have
to put up with strangers traipsing around next to their house? |
A:
If they bought property with deeded public access, yes, they should.
|
They
knew the public access point was there before they signed the papers,
and if the concept bothered them, they shouldn't have bought the property. |
Many
people buy properties with (for example) an easement for a driveway
into someone else's interior lot. If they decide that they don't like
the idea of cars driving up that driveway, that doesn't give them
the right to try to eliminate the easement. |
Opinions
differ on this subject, but we feel that this kind of behavior is
utterly reprehensible. State tax money paid to establish the public-access
areas, and we cannot help but view attempts to "privatize"
them as anything other than theft of public property. That land
belongs to all of us. |
Next
question | Back to Q & A index |
|